You are here >> Home >> health >> Medical Health Care and Medical Practice >>

Healthcare in Countries in Transition

Healthcare in Countries in Transition (6)

——

2008-07-31 11:41:43  author:admin  Source:Internet  Hits:0  Font size :【Big】【Medium】【Small

To control this kind of transformation, medical information management systems need to be introduced. These improve both the quality and the quantity of data available to the management of the hospital and, as a result, the decision making process.

This makes it easier for the management to pinpoint which areas require doing what - for instance, what kind of incentives should go to which members of the staff, where could costs be cut, and where and how could productivity be improved.

Finally, a novel concept is emerging. Universities and hospitals are two important repositories of human knowledge and experience. Virtually every hospital somehow collaborates with an academic institution, or with a medical school.

But, during the last two decades, hospitals have re-cast themselves in the role of partners to the commercial exploitation of the results of research conducted within their premises or with their co-operation. Hospitals now collaborate in pharmaceutical, medical, genetic and bioengineering studies. Hospitals believe that by refraining from getting commercially involved - they give up money which really is not theirs to give up in the first place.

Large hospitals also entered the managed care market - where laws permit it. Some have established MCOs (Managed Care Organizations of patients). Others insure patients outright and market their services directly. Most hospitals now maintain their own network of suppliers. HMO's are inevitably less than thrilled with the emergence of these new competitors - but this process of disintermediation is thought to have increased both the profit margins and the absolute profits of public hospitals.

Public hospitals also pool resources to benefit from advantages of scale. They relegate services - from auditing and accounting to political lobbying - to commonly owned or merely centralized service providers. These providers also negotiate contracts with suppliers and specialists on behalf of the hospitals.

Some observers decry the apparent convergence between public hospitals and their private brethren. Such derision is misplaced. Public hospitals still treat the destitute and the immigrant. They still provide a medical safety net where no alternative exists. They are just doing it better, more rationally, and more cheaply. They should do more to open up to scrutiny. They should spin doctor. They should streamline. But one thing they should not do is regress to where they have been in the early 1990's. This is what the doctor ordered.
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

Editor:admin


Related articles
Healthcare Software Solution
WARNING to Women! Part 1 in a series on Women's Healthcare for Women and those who love them.
Healthcare Fraud Investigations: How Healthcare Compliance Programs Save Your Practice
Society Success, Healthcare and Capitalist Evangelism
Medical Tourism: Advantages of Overseas Healthcare
GP’s Choose Private Healthcare Over NHS
Drug Courts: A Shot in the Arm for Our Struggling Healthcare System?
New Direction in healthcare
Cost-price Drugs Plan for Poor Countries
Copyright© 2006-2008 guidefinger.com All rights reserved.